Thursday, May 3, 2012
Response to Hannah
We Made It!
Tuesday, April 24, 2012
Peer Evaluation for Rob
Thursday, April 19, 2012
Peer Evaluation for Christina
Monday, April 16, 2012
Peer Evaluation for Lee
Reflective Essay for "Got [Chocolate] Milk?"
I was very excited to discuss this topic. It’s actually something that I’ve discussed with a significant amount of people, after knowing the facts for about a year or so. I was aiming to clearly present this topic, because it’s something I’m so comfortable with. Physically, I wanted to have everyone feel that I knew what I was discussing through my body language and tone. Emotionally, I wanted everyone to be convinced that this snack that most people consider to be junk food was actually the best way to refuel the body after a workout. I had the facts to back up my claims, and I had the proof, through my own recovery period, that chocolate milk helped the most when recovering.
I did not feel as comfortable as I anticipated, but I didn’t do too badly of a job. I had all the research, facts, and claims that I wanted, as well as the knowledge from discussing it so much with people. I think I got my point across fairly well, and related it well with the audience, using real-life examples from the “Got Milk?” commercials. I still am not as fluent when speaking as I would like to be. It’s hard, because I don’t write down my speech completely on the note cards as many people do because I want to learn not to stutter. But then I hear all these people go up and speak without a stutter in their speech. I am happy with my progression otherwise, and regardless, I still believe I connected well with the audience. Additionally, these 4 years of college are probably the time where people do athletic activity the most, so it’s a wise tip that I think many of my classmates listened to.
This speech round, I learned that, as comfortable as you are with a subject, it’s important to be very sure about what you are going to say, or else you’ll probably stutter. I knew what I was going to say, but I don’t think I practiced enough in order to fluently express my thoughts to the audience. For my next and last speech, my hope is to have a speech nearly free of stuttering. I think that otherwise, my purpose and claims come across cleanly, and my tone and delivery are generally good. The fluency of my speaking will be the key to success for my next speech and for the real world.
Tuesday, April 3, 2012
Peer Evaluation for Christina
Thursday, March 29, 2012
Peer Evaluation for Cameron
Peer Evaluation for Evan
Tuesday, March 27, 2012
Reflective Essay for Persuasive Speech #1
This speech had more of a challenge then just to persuade my audience of my thoughts. I also had to counter the ideas of a previous speaker, as Jared argued on the other side of the social networking argument. Physically, I was aiming to portray subtle confidence, while connecting with them on a relatable level as well, since social networking is so prominent in today’s society. Emotionally, I was aiming to grasp their attention by demonstrating my fondness for social networking, like Facebook, but arguing that it needs to be altered in certain ways. Knowing that many of my audience members enjoyed social networking as well, I could relate with them on that fact, and then direct the audience’s attention to my argument.
I felt significantly better about this speech than I did about my previous speeches. I felt more prepared, most likely because we’ve had a lot of practice with all of the speeches. I think my point got across as well, as the audience, although time constraint cut them short, seemed to have many intriguing questions about the subject matter. Thus I felt a good connection on that level with them. Additionally, my speech appeared to intrigue them as well, as they reacted as anticipated to certain remarks that I made during the speech, whether it was a laugh, smile, or head nod. My volume appears to be good, and my tone is better than previous speeches as well.
After this speech round, I learned that preparation is crucial to a successful speech. I used my note cards far more effectively than I did with the previous speeches, and thus, conveyed my point clearly. One thing I would like to work on is my transitions. I had them prepared, but I don’t think I used them word for word. I also think that they could be created better and develop the next point more clearly. Overall, though, I am pleased with the outcome of this speech, and look forward to my continued growth in my public speaking ability.
Tuesday, February 28, 2012
Informative Speech Reflection
Going into the speech, I was really excited to be speaking about drugs in baseball. It’s a prevalent issue that still has lingering effects from the “Steroid Era”. To start, I looked to get the audience interested on the topic by humor. I talked about the “Mac Attack Bat”, which was an old childhood toy that used to crush the cover off of a wiffleball. Then, I wanted to transition into the speech with a more serious tone. Physically, I looked to continue scanning the room, making eye contact with people in the classroom to make sure I had their attention. I also wanted to make sure I wasn’t leaning on the table, or having my hands in my pockets. Something that I’ve learned is that it seems easier to maintain attention when the speaker is using their hands, making gestures, as opposed to standing with their hands in their pockets.
Generally, I think I did a good job completing my goals for this speech. I sort of lucked out after having the battery of the recording device fill up because I was able to joke around a little bit prior to the speech. I like to do this because I think it loosens me up a little bit, and since the beginning of a speech can be a little nerve-racking, it’s good to feel a little looser. Listening back to the tape, I think my tone could be a little clearer. Additionally, I use a lot of “umm” and “uhh” in my speech, and I tend to stutter over my words a little bit. Those are some things I should look to improve upon. But overall, I felt okay about this speech. In regards to the audience, I think I was able to connect very well with them. They had several questions at the closure of my speech, and seemed attentive while I gave it.
I think what I learned the most came from the recordings. I feel my speech can be smoother, so maybe what I can do to correct that is prepare my transitions better. Additionally, I was about 10 seconds over the time limit, so I should also plan the timing of my speech better. I think I made better use of my notecards this time around since I actually used them, so I never really struggled to remember what I was saying. Because it was a longer timeframe to work with, I think I assumed that I could take my time at the beginning, which ultimately was why I went over the time limit. Thus, I believe that after this speech, two things I need to focus on are time management and the fluency of my speeches.
Monday, February 27, 2012
Response to Elise
Response to Rob
Thursday, February 16, 2012
Physically, for this speech, I was looking to appear a little more relaxed than the first speech. Although I do feel I did well being able to appear calm, I was definitely nervous during the first speech. For this one, however, since it was an extra credit speech, I was more relaxed knowing there wasn’t anything to lose by making this speech. Additionally, I was talking about a subject matter that I’m very knowledgeable about, which is cycling. This relates to my emotional goals for this speech. The athlete I spoke of, Alberto Contador, was one of my longtime favorite cyclists as I gained interest in the sport. To see his demise occur this way is rather saddening and disappointing for the sport, and I looked to illustrate that in the way I spoke.
Making the speech, like I previously stated, was easier this time than the first speech because I’ve had experience and the event occurred last week rather than 14 years ago (as in my introductory speech). I felt very positive about my speech; I knew exactly what I wanted to say, I knew the order I wanted to speak of the events leading up to it, and I knew the background information I wanted to give out at the beginning of the speech. Additionally, I felt a strong connection with several audience members. I saw many smiles when I mentioned Contador’s excuse that contaminated meat was the reason for his failed drug test. A few students laughed when I mentioned that I always wanted to be “like Mike” (Michael Jordan) on the basketball court. So I definitely felt that a strong connection has been made and is being formed in general with the audience that I’ve been speaking to.
I think one thing I’ve learned and continue to learn is that you can never over-prepare when planning a speech. I knew exactly what I needed to say, but I still found myself saying “umm” or “like”, filler words which should really be avoided. One thing I do notice is that I make note cards, and never end up using them. One thing to maybe consider is constructing and writing a note card that has trigger words that I know I’ll use instead of filler words. Another thing I would personally like to focus on is my conclusions. I struggle to clearly get my point across at the end of the speech. In this case, I think there was so many important things about eh outcome of this case that I simply didn’t know how to summarize them into one. I definitely want to be more prepared when I think about what to say for future conclusions.
Thursday, February 9, 2012
Reflective Essay for Loss Speech
Going into the speech, I did not really have any concrete expectations. I think one thing I do very well is entertain people, so I knew garnering a class’ attention would not be terribly difficult. Additionally, I knew my subject matter was rather light-hearted and, with proper delivery, I figured my speech would go fairly well. Physically, I was hoping to be able to move around, and attempt to make eye contact with everyone in the classroom. I wanted everyone to have a feeling of involvement and truly relate to the speech I was giving. In another emotional perspective, I wanted the audience to not have a sense of sorrow for my “loss”, but a sense of joy in recollecting the fun times of their childhood.
Being able to go third, in my opinion, was advantageous. Although I was interested in going first, going early on still allowed me the opportunity to speak early while the topic was on my mind. Furthermore, I did not have to wait around and dwell on ways to improve, or on ways my speech could have gone awry. I think the speech itself went tremendously well. I was able to get some sort of smile or chuckle out of most of the students. Additionally, I think the audience’s questions pertaining to my speech truly showed the relation that they felt to their own childhoods. For instance, one student asked if I had attempted anything drastic, like tying my tooth by a string and a door. I think this also showed the lightheartedness the audience felt, which is something I was aiming for. Additionally, I finished within the time limit, which I am pleased with.
There were several things I think I could have done better for the speech. I wasn’t able to move around as much as I anticipated. Frankly, I didn’t move at all. I think that my thinking was, since it was a short speech, a lot of movement might take away from the overall message of the story. Another thing I could have done better was reduce the number of filler words that I used, like “umm” and “like”. While I didn’t speed up too much during the speech, there wasn’t always a flow to it, as I struggled to remember exactly what I wanted to say to the audience. I did not even use the note card that I brought up, which I actually was pleased with, because it demonstrates that I remembered enough to get through the speech.
For the next speech, I think the most important thing for me to focus on is to have a better flow to the speech. I think the more fluent a speech is, the better an audience understands and pays attention to the speech. Another thing that will be something to consider is that not all of my speeches will be fun like that one, so I’ll need the ability to take on more serious subject matters.